Home loans: Why your age and tenure are important

June 23, 2008

Source: Rediff & ApnaLoan

Choosing right home loan tenure is as important an option as choosing an interest rate for the loan or focus on repayment and prepayment options.

There are several factors to be considered when one decides to take a home loan for a specific period.

Is age on your side?

The first important factor is the age. The younger the age, higher is the tenure available to a home loan borrower. This means, if one decides to take a loan in her/his 30s, s/he can get a loan for 20 years — the maximum loan tenure offered by most Indian banks currently.

Interest rates: Beware of ups and downs

When taking a loan, one must take into account the fact that interest rates fluctuate during the loan tenure. You just have to consider the interest rate movement on home loans in the last eight years to understand how fluctuating these rates have been.

The fluctuation will impact the home loan EMI (the amount of money you pay every month to your lender), whether one takes a loan at a fixed interest rate or floating interest rate.

Why age is important

If the loan borrower is younger, s/he can get an extension in her/his loan tenure. Remember that some banks offer maximum loan tenure of 25 years. If the loan borrower is in her/his 40s, the only option available in such a case would be to increase the EMI. And this can cause a lot of pain especially in times of soaring inflation.

But this is easier said than done. The reason is, by the time you are in your 40s, the rate of increase in potential income is much lesser as compared to what one can expect at a younger age, say in mid 20s or early 30s.

Another benefit of a younger age is the increased loan eligibility. Even though the current income is taken into account while giving a loan, the potential of increase in salary is also taken as a factor. So, one can easily opt for a top-up loan (a loan on top of an already existing loan) to meet personal needs or take care of an increased EMI if at all a borrower faces such a situation.

There are repayment options such as step-up repayment facility where the EMI is low in the initial period and increases at a later stage. This actually coincides with an increase in salary of a salaried borrower. This could be ideal for young borrowers who are climbing rungs professionally. But this is an option available for the younger lot.

How it makes a difference!

Let’s take an example. A 30-year old individual, say Amit, takes a home loan of Rs 30 lakh at an interest rate of 9 per cent for 20 years say in 2006. Amit earns about Rs 50, 000 per month then. Now let’s assume that the interest rate on Amit’s home loan increases to 11 per cent in 2008. Since Amit is 30 years old, he has an option of increasing the loan tenure to 25 years (even after increasing the loan tenure to 25 years Amit is still below his retirement age of 60 years as mentioned above).

Impact of changed rates with the tenure increase option

As the table below shows in the five years since 2003 Amit’s EMI has increased by Rs 4,605 in 2008. This is an annual increase of Rs 921 every year. This may not pinch much when prices are down but when inflation is around 11 per cent (as the figures for the week ending June 7 showed) then it sure pains a lot.

EMI increase if Amit increases his tenure Situation in 2003 Situation in 2008 if the tenure is increased to 25 years
Interest rate 9 per cent 12 per cent
EMI on a Rs 30 lakh loan Rs 26, 992 Rs 31, 597

Now let’s see the calculations if Amit were in his 40s. In this case the option of increasing the loan tenure would not be available as adding 25 years would take Amit beyond the eligible age of 60 years. The only option then would be to increase his home loan EMI.

Impact of changed rates if the EMI is increased

EMI increase if Amit were in his 40s Situation in 2003 Situation in 2008 if the EMI is increased
Interest rate 9 per cent 12 per cent
EMI Rs 26, 992 Rs 33, 033

SEC Delays 404(b) Compliance for Small Biz

June 23, 2008

The Securities and Exchange Commission has granted small companies a one-year reprieve with regard to complying with the auditor-attestation requirements of Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

With the extension, smaller companies will now be required to provide the attestation reports in their annual reports for fiscal years ending on or after December 15, 2009.

“The extension of the Section 404(b) compliance date for smaller companies is the latest in a series of Commission efforts to help reduce unnecessary compliance costs for smaller companies while preserving important investor protections,”

Section 404 has two provisions: 404(a) requires company management to assess the effectiveness of the company’s internal controls over financial reporting, while 404(b) requires an auditor attestation on management’s assessment.

Source: CFO.com


FDA eliminates baseline reports

June 23, 2008

An FDA direct final rule will eliminate the need to prepare and file baseline reports regarding medical devices.
Currently, manufacturers are required to file baseline reports with the first adverse event report for a device and then update those baseline reports annually. The baseline report includes the FDA product code, the device’s shelf life, the device identifier, and the basis for marketing the device.
The FDA proposes eliminating the baseline reporting requirement because the data is also provided in individual adverse event reports required on FDA Form 3500A The direct final rule becomes effective October 27, unless the FDA receives significant adverse comments regarding the elimination of the baseline reports.
Source: FDA